Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Protocol - realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES)

BMC Medical Research Methodology201111:115

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-115

Received: 5 March 2011

Accepted: 16 August 2011

Published: 16 August 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Mar 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Geoff Wong
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Geoff Wong
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
16 Aug 2011 Editorially accepted
16 Aug 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-11-115

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Healthcare Innovation and Policy Unit, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry
(2)
Community Matters
(3)
School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds

Advertisement