Reporting of loss to follow-up information in randomised controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes: a literature survey
© Vervölgyi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 4 January 2011
Accepted: 21 September 2011
Published: 21 September 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|4 Jan 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Feb 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Beyersmann|
|21 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eleanor Pullenayegum|
|21 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Elke Vervölgyi|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Beyersmann|
|25 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eleanor Pullenayegum|
|30 Jun 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Elke Vervölgyi|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|30 Jun 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eleanor Pullenayegum|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|21 Sep 2011||Editorially accepted|
|21 Sep 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-11-130|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.