Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Reporting of loss to follow-up information in randomised controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes: a literature survey

  • Elke Vervölgyi1Email author,
  • Mandy Kromp1,
  • Guido Skipka1,
  • Ralf Bender1, 2 and
  • Thomas Kaiser1
Contributed equally
BMC Medical Research Methodology201111:130

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-130

Received: 4 January 2011

Accepted: 21 September 2011

Published: 21 September 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Jan 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Beyersmann
21 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eleanor Pullenayegum
21 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Elke Vervölgyi
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Beyersmann
25 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eleanor Pullenayegum
30 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Elke Vervölgyi
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
2 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eleanor Pullenayegum
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
21 Sep 2011 Editorially accepted
21 Sep 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-11-130

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG)
(2)
Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne

Advertisement