Suitability of measures of self-reported medication adherence for routine clinical use: A systematic review
© Garfield et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 13 April 2011
Accepted: 3 November 2011
Published: 3 November 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Apr 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Manias|
|17 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sunil Kripalani|
|26 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johnson George|
|29 Jul 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Sara Garfield|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Jul 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Manias|
|20 Sep 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Sara Garfield|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Sep 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Nov 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Sara Garfield|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|2 Nov 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|3 Nov 2011||Editorially accepted|
|3 Nov 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-11-149|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.