Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Mobile phones are a viable option for surveying young Australian women: a comparison of two telephone survey methods

  • Bette Liu1Email author,
  • Julia ML Brotherton2,
  • David Shellard3,
  • Basil Donovan1, 4,
  • Marion Saville2 and
  • John M Kaldor1
BMC Medical Research Methodology201111:159

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-159

Received: 13 September 2011

Accepted: 24 November 2011

Published: 24 November 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Sep 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karin Leder
6 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lawrence Barker
6 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Bette Liu
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Bette Liu
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Bette Liu
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
24 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Bette Liu
Resubmission - Version 7
24 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
24 Nov 2011 Editorially accepted
24 Nov 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-11-159

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales
(2)
Victorian Cytology Service
(3)
The Hunter Valley Research Foundation
(4)
Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Sydney Hospital

Advertisement