Recruitment difficulties in a primary care cluster randomised trial: investigating factors contributing to general practitioners' recruitment of patients
© Page et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 8 September 2010
Accepted: 31 March 2011
Published: 31 March 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Sep 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Sep 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jean-Francois Chenot|
|15 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Oliver, Rudolf Herber|
|1 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Horst Christian Vollmar|
|22 Dec 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Simon French|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Dec 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Jan 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Oliver, Rudolf Herber|
|10 Feb 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Simon French|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|10 Feb 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Feb 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Oliver, Rudolf Herber|
|25 Mar 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Simon French|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|25 Mar 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|31 Mar 2011||Editorially accepted|
|31 Mar 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-11-35|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.