Effect of questionnaire length, personalisation and reminder type on response rate to a complex postal survey: randomised controlled trial
© Sahlqvist et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 13 January 2011
Accepted: 6 May 2011
Published: 6 May 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Jan 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Feb 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Phil Edwards|
|6 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Timothy Johnson|
|14 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jeanette Ziegenfuss|
|13 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Shannon Sahlqvist|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Shannon Sahlqvist|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 May 2011||Editorially accepted|
|6 May 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-11-62|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.