Stratified sampling design and loss to follow-up in survival models: evaluation of efficiency and bias
© César and Carvalho; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 25 September 2010
Accepted: 26 June 2011
Published: 26 June 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Sep 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robin Henderson|
|9 Feb 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chiu-Hsieh (Paul) Hsu|
|15 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Cibele César|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Cibele César|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|28 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robin Henderson|
|31 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chiu-Hsieh (Paul) Hsu|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|26 Jun 2011||Editorially accepted|
|26 Jun 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-11-99|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.