Analyzing repeated data collected by mobile phones and frequent text messages. An example of Low back pain measured weekly for 18 weeks
© Axén et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 24 May 2011
Accepted: 4 July 2012
Published: 23 July 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 May 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Luciana Macedo|
|5 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Staines|
|2 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Iben Axén|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|2 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Staines|
|14 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Luciana Macedo|
|14 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Iben Axén|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|14 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|3 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Staines|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|4 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|23 Jul 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-12-105|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.