Comparing marginal structural models to standard methods for estimating treatment effects of antihypertensive combination therapy
© Gerhard et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 8 November 2011
Accepted: 30 July 2012
Published: 6 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|8 Nov 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yasutaka Chiba|
|18 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Evan Thacker|
|7 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Joseph Delaney|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Evan Thacker|
|24 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yasutaka Chiba|
|2 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Joseph Delaney|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|2 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|4 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yasutaka Chiba|
|17 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Joseph Delaney|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|17 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|30 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|6 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-12-119|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.