Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Using patient management as a surrogate for patient health outcomes in diagnostic test evaluation

  • Lukas P Staub1Email author,
  • Sarah J Lord1,
  • R John Simes1,
  • Suzanne Dyer1,
  • Nehmat Houssami2,
  • Robert YM Chen3 and
  • Les Irwig2
BMC Medical Research Methodology201212:12

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-12

Received: 25 July 2011

Accepted: 14 February 2012

Published: 14 February 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Jul 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ann Van den Bruel
15 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Klaus Eichler
5 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Lukas P Staub
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ann Van den Bruel
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
14 Feb 2012 Editorially accepted
14 Feb 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-12-12

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney
(2)
The Screening and Test Evaluation Program, The University of Sydney
(3)
St. Vincent's Hospital

Advertisement