Patient, caregiver, health professional and researcher views and experiences of participating in research at the end of life: a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature
© Gysels et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 14 September 2011
Accepted: 28 May 2012
Published: 17 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janet Hardy|
|10 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johan Bilsen|
|21 Nov 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Marjolein Gysels|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Nov 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janet Hardy|
|10 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Marjolein Gysels|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 May 2012||Editorially accepted|
|17 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-12-123|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.