Two assessments to evaluate imagery ability: translation, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the German KVIQ and Imaprax
© Schuster et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 8 April 2011
Accepted: 13 June 2012
Published: 20 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Apr 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christian Collet|
|29 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vanessa Scholtes|
|31 Aug 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Brigitte Wirth|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|31 Aug 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christian Collet|
|27 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Girdhar Agarwal|
|31 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Brigitte Wirth|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|31 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|10 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Girdhar Agarwal|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|13 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|20 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-12-127|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.