Do health care institutions value research? A mixed methods study of barriers and facilitators to methodological rigor in pediatric randomized trials
© Hamm et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 10 February 2012
Accepted: 15 October 2012
Published: 18 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthias Briel|
|3 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roberta Scherer|
|7 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Michele Dyson|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|7 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roberta Scherer|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|15 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|18 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-12-158|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.