Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Internet trials: participant experiences and perspectives

  • Erin Mathieu1Email author,
  • Alexandra Barratt2,
  • Stacy M Carter3 and
  • Gro Jamtvedt4
BMC Medical Research Methodology201212:162

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-162

Received: 15 August 2012

Accepted: 19 October 2012

Published: 23 October 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
15 Aug 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Janie Busby Grant
11 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sinead Brophy
15 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Erin Mathieu
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Oct 2012 Editorially accepted
23 Oct 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-12-162

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney
School of Public Health, University of Sydney
Centre for Values, Ethics and Law in Medicine, University of Sydney
The Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services