Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The use of continuous data versus binary data in MTC models: A case study in rheumatoid arthritis

BMC Medical Research Methodology201212:167

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-167

Received: 23 May 2012

Accepted: 30 October 2012

Published: 6 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 May 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Susanne Schmitz
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sibylle Sturtz
27 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sven Trelle
28 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Susanne Schmitz
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sven Trelle
25 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Susanne Schmitz
Resubmission - Version 5
25 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
30 Oct 2012 Editorially accepted
6 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-12-167

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Statistics, Trinity College Dublin
(2)
National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics

Advertisement