A framework for organizing and selecting quantitative approaches for benefit-harm assessment
© Puhan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 3 October 2011
Accepted: 2 November 2012
Published: 19 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|3 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michele Shaffer|
|11 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Sepucha|
|23 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Milo Puhan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Sepucha|
|7 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Milo Puhan|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|7 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|19 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-12-173|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.