Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Bayesian methods in clinical trials: a Bayesian analysis of ECOG trials E1684 and E1690

BMC Medical Research Methodology201212:183

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-183

Received: 10 August 2012

Accepted: 6 November 2012

Published: 29 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
10 Aug 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rahim Alhamzawi
29 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francisco Louzada
24 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Haitao Chu
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francisco Louzada
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
29 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-12-183

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, McGavran Greenberg Hall
Department of Statistics, University of Connecticut
Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota