Bayesian methods in clinical trials: a Bayesian analysis of ECOG trials E1684 and E1690
© Ibrahim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 10 August 2012
Accepted: 6 November 2012
Published: 29 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|10 Aug 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rahim Alhamzawi|
|29 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Francisco Louzada|
|24 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Haitao Chu|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Francisco Louzada|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|29 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-12-183|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.