Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Why do you think you should be the author on this manuscript? Analysis of open-ended responses of authors in a general medical journal

  • Mario Malički1,
  • Ana Jerončić1,
  • Matko Marušić1 and
  • Ana Marušić1Email author
BMC Medical Research Methodology201212:189

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-189

Received: 29 August 2012

Accepted: 12 December 2012

Published: 20 December 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Aug 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ljiljana Vuckovic-Dekic
20 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lorraine Ferris
30 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Ana Marusic
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
12 Dec 2012 Editorially accepted
20 Dec 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-12-189

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split, School of Medicine

Advertisement