Definitions and methods of measuring and reporting on injurious falls in randomised controlled fall prevention trials: a systematic review
- Michael Schwenk†1Email author,
- Andreas Lauenroth†2,
- Christian Stock2, 3,
- Raquel Rodriguez Moreno1,
- Peter Oster1,
- Gretl McHugh4,
- Chris Todd4 and
- Klaus Hauer1
© Schwenk et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 22 September 2011
Accepted: 17 April 2012
Published: 17 April 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Magnus Karlsson|
|8 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Campbell|
|13 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ian Cameron|
|14 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Catherine Sherrington|
|16 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Michael Schwenk|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Apr 2012||Editorially accepted|
|17 Apr 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-12-50|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.