Individual participant data meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies: state of the art?
© Abo-Zaid et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 9 August 2011
Accepted: 24 April 2012
Published: 24 April 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Aug 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bob Phillips|
|24 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ewout Steyerberg|
|14 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Richard Riley|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bob Phillips|
|24 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ewout Steyerberg|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Apr 2012||Editorially accepted|
|24 Apr 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-12-56|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.