Choice of observational study design impacts on measurement of antipsychotic risks in the elderly: a systematic review
© Pratt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 22 June 2011
Accepted: 18 April 2012
Published: 8 June 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|22 Jun 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gianluca Trifiro'|
|26 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emilio Sacchetti|
|14 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Nicole Pratt|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gianluca Trifiro'|
|23 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emilio Sacchetti|
|19 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Nicole Pratt|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Apr 2012||Editorially accepted|
|8 Jun 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-12-72|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.