Improvement of maternal Aboriginality in NSW birth data
© Xu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 15 March 2011
Accepted: 30 January 2012
Published: 30 January 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|15 Mar 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steven Guthridge|
|10 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brenda Elias|
|17 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martha Wingate|
|18 Sep 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Fenglian Xu|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Sep 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brenda Elias|
|10 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steven Guthridge|
|21 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Fenglian Xu|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|21 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|29 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Fenglian Xu|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|29 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|30 Jan 2012||Editorially accepted|
|30 Jan 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-12-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.