Evaluating audio computer assisted self-interviews in urban south African communities: evidence for good suitability and reduced social desirability bias of a cross-sectional survey on sexual behaviour
© Beauclair et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 15 October 2012
Accepted: 25 January 2013
Published: 31 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sandra Edwards|
|13 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charles Turner|
|14 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Roxanne Beauclair|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|31 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-13-11|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.