Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research
© Gale et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 17 December 2012
Accepted: 6 September 2013
Published: 18 September 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Dec 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ethel Quayle|
|26 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Markus Themessl-Huber|
|29 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gavin Daker-White|
|15 Aug 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Nicola Gale|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Aug 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gavin Daker-White|
|6 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Nicola Gale|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|6 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 Sep 2013||Editorially accepted|
|18 Sep 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-13-117|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.