Integrating and extending cohort studies: lessons from the eXtending Treatments, Education and Networks in Depression (xTEND) study
© Allen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 18 December 2012
Accepted: 25 September 2013
Published: 5 October 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|18 Dec 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Joanne Allen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|7 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jenny Theodora van der Steen|
|24 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Scott Hofer|
|10 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Joanne Allen|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|10 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|28 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jenny Theodora van der Steen|
|18 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Joanne Allen|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|18 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|25 Sep 2013||Editorially accepted|
|5 Oct 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-13-122|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.