Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Using the random forest method to detect a response shift in the quality of life of multiple sclerosis patients: a cohort study

  • Mohamed Boucekine1Email author,
  • Anderson Loundou1,
  • Karine Baumstarck1,
  • Patricia Minaya-Flores1,
  • Jean Pelletier2,
  • Badih Ghattas3 and
  • Pascal Auquier1
BMC Medical Research Methodology201313:20

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-20

Received: 5 November 2012

Accepted: 13 February 2013

Published: 15 February 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Nov 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Karine Baumstarck
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Jongen
3 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hiromi KIKUCHI
14 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Karine Baumstarck
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hiromi KIKUCHI
11 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Jongen
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
13 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
15 Feb 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-13-20

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
EA3279, Self-perceived Health Assessment Research Unit, School of Medicine, Université de la Méditerranée
(2)
Departments of Neurology and CRMBM CNRS6612, Timone University Hospital, APHM
(3)
Department of Mathematics, Faculté des Sciences de Luminy, Aix-Marseille University

Advertisement