Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Systematically reviewing and synthesizing evidence from conversation analytic and related discursive research to inform healthcare communication practice and policy: an illustrated guide

BMC Medical Research Methodology201313:69

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-69

Received: 21 November 2012

Accepted: 6 May 2013

Published: 30 May 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Nov 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Nowak
8 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Douglas Maynard
2 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Ruth Parry
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Nowak
2 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Douglas Maynard
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
6 May 2013 Editorially accepted
30 May 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-13-69

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Sue Ryder Centre for the Study of Supportive, Palliative and End of Life Care, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre
(2)
Independent Researcher

Advertisement