The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner’s survey response rates – a systematic review
© Pit et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 20 January 2014
Accepted: 28 May 2014
Published: 6 June 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|20 Jan 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sally Bell-Syer|
|18 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judith Malmgren|
|2 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Billie Bonevski|
|22 May 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Sabrina Pit|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 May 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 May 2014||Editorially accepted|
|6 Jun 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-14-76|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.