Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: If A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C?

BMC Medical Research Methodology20022:13

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-2-13

Received: 13 September 2002

Accepted: 13 November 2002

Published: 13 November 2002

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Sep 2002 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Oct 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ulrich Abel
24 Oct 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Norma Terrin
4 Nov 2002 Author responded Author comments - Stuart Baker
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Nov 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Nov 2002 Author responded Author comments - Stuart Baker
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Nov 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Nov 2002 Author responded Author comments - Stuart Baker
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Nov 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
13 Nov 2002 Editorially accepted
13 Nov 2002 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-2-13

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute
(2)
Offices of Disease Prevention and Medical Applications of Research, National Institutes of Health

Advertisement