Using observational data to estimate an upper bound on the reduction in cancer mortality due to periodic screening
© Baker et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003
Received: 15 November 2002
Accepted: 6 March 2003
Published: 6 March 2003
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Nov 2002||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Dec 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen W Duffy|
|30 Dec 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin McIntosh|
|21 Jan 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Stuart Baker|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Jan 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Jan 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen W Duffy|
|27 Feb 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Stuart Baker|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Feb 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 Mar 2003||Editorially accepted|
|6 Mar 2003||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-3-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.