Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Quantifying errors without random sampling

BMC Medical Research Methodology20033:9

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-3-9

Received: 16 July 2002

Accepted: 12 June 2003

Published: 12 June 2003

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
16 Jul 2002 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Aug 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Cole
24 Oct 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charles Poole
25 Jan 2003 Author responded Author comments - Carl Phillips
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Jan 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Feb 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Cole
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
12 Jun 2003 Editorially accepted
12 Jun 2003 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-3-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Management and Policy Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health and Center for Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine, University of Texas Medical School Houston
University of Minnesota School of Public Health