Quantifying errors without random sampling
© Phillips and LaPole; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003
Received: 16 July 2002
Accepted: 12 June 2003
Published: 12 June 2003
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|16 Jul 2002||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Aug 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen Cole|
|24 Oct 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charles Poole|
|25 Jan 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Carl Phillips|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Jan 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|3 Feb 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen Cole|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|12 Jun 2003||Editorially accepted|
|12 Jun 2003||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-3-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.