Comparing breast cancer mortality rates before-and-after a change in availability of screening in different regions: Extension of the paired availability design
© Baker et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 21 January 2004
Accepted: 18 May 2004
Published: 18 May 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Jan 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Feb 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eugenio Paci|
|23 Feb 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen W Duffy|
|5 Mar 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dik Habbema|
|9 Apr 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Stuart Baker|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Apr 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 May 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Stuart Baker|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|13 May 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 May 2004||Editorially accepted|
|18 May 2004||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-4-12|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.