Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature: two bibliometric surveys
© Bland; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 12 May 2004
Accepted: 13 August 2004
Published: 13 August 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 May 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Jun 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judy Simpson|
|29 Jun 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Campbell|
|5 Jul 2004||Author responded||Author comments - John Martin Bland|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Jul 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Aug 2004||Author responded||Author comments - John Martin Bland|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Aug 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Aug 2004||Editorially accepted|
|13 Aug 2004||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-4-21|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.