"Any other comments?" Open questions on questionnaires – a bane or a bonus to research?
© O'Cathain and Thomas; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 16 July 2004
Accepted: 08 November 2004
Published: 08 November 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 Jul 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Jul 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elaine McColl|
|24 Aug 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - keith meadows|
|8 Sep 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Petra Boynton|
|27 Sep 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Alicia O'Cathain|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Sep 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Oct 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - keith meadows|
|4 Nov 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Alicia O'Cathain|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|4 Nov 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Nov 2004||Editorially accepted|
|8 Nov 2004||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-4-25|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.