A survey of statistics in three UK general practice journal
© Rigby et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 15 September 2004
Accepted: 13 December 2004
Published: 13 December 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Sep 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Oct 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martha Shumway|
|1 Nov 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Reed|
|29 Nov 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Alan Steven Rigby|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Nov 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Dec 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Alan Steven Rigby|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|8 Dec 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|13 Dec 2004||Editorially accepted|
|13 Dec 2004||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-4-28|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.