Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A survey of statistics in three UK general practice journal

  • Alan S Rigby1Email author,
  • Gillian K Armstrong2,
  • Michael J Campbell3 and
  • Nick Summerton4
BMC Medical Research Methodology20044:28

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-28

Received: 15 September 2004

Accepted: 13 December 2004

Published: 13 December 2004

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
15 Sep 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Oct 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martha Shumway
1 Nov 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Reed
29 Nov 2004 Author responded Author comments - Alan Steven Rigby
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Nov 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
8 Dec 2004 Author responded Author comments - Alan Steven Rigby
Resubmission - Version 5
8 Dec 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 5
13 Dec 2004 Editorially accepted
13 Dec 2004 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-4-28

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Academic Cardiology, University of Hull
NAPP Pharmaceuticals Research Limited
Medical Statistics Unit, University of Sheffield
Division of Primary Care & Psychological Medicine, University of Hull