Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies
© Shaw et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 06 November 2003
Accepted: 16 March 2004
Published: 16 March 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Nov 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Dec 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - George Swingler|
|23 Dec 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pamela Royle|
|27 Jan 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Rachel Shaw|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Jan 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Feb 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - George Swingler|
|16 Mar 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Rachel Shaw|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Mar 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Mar 2004||Editorially accepted|
|16 Mar 2004||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-4-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.