Systematic reviews of epidemiology in diabetes: finding the evidence
© Royle et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 11 August 2004
Accepted: 08 January 2005
Published: 08 January 2005
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|11 Aug 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Aug 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Pamela Royle|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|13 Aug 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Oct 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Booth|
|16 Nov 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Pamela Royle|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|16 Nov 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|3 Dec 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Booth|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|16 Dec 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Pamela Royle|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|16 Dec 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|8 Jan 2005||Editorially accepted|
|8 Jan 2005||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-5-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.