Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review
© Crumley et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 23 February 2005
Accepted: 10 August 2005
Published: 10 August 2005
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Feb 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Mar 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pamela Royle|
|30 Mar 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carolyn Green|
|11 May 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Ellen Crumley|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 May 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 May 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pamela Royle|
|1 Jun 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carolyn Green|
|12 Jul 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Ellen Crumley|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Jul 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|10 Aug 2005||Editorially accepted|
|10 Aug 2005||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-5-24|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.