Circular instead of hierarchical: methodological principles for the evaluation of complex interventions
© Walach et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 06 April 2006
Accepted: 24 June 2006
Published: 24 June 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Apr 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Apr 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robyn Bluhm|
|3 May 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rachelle Seguin|
|30 May 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Harald Walach|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 May 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Jun 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robyn Bluhm|
|16 Jun 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Harald Walach|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|16 Jun 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Jun 2006||Editorially accepted|
|24 Jun 2006||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-6-29|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.