Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects

BMC Medical Research Methodology20066:3

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-3

Received: 19 September 2005

Accepted: 27 January 2006

Published: 27 January 2006

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Sep 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Oct 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Max Pittler
11 Oct 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sheena Derry
17 Oct 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Ashby
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Dec 2005 Author responded Author comments - Su Golder
Resubmission - Version 5
2 Dec 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 5
12 Dec 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sheena Derry
15 Dec 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Ashby
16 Dec 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Max Pittler
21 Dec 2005 Author responded Author comments - Su Golder
Resubmission - Version 6
21 Dec 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 6
21 Dec 2005 Author responded Author comments - Su Golder
Resubmission - Version 7
21 Dec 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
27 Jan 2006 Editorially accepted
27 Jan 2006 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-6-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), University of York
(2)
University of East Anglia
(3)
NHS Quality Improvement Scotland

Advertisement