The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency
© Nieminen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 17 April 2006
Accepted: 01 September 2006
Published: 01 September 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Apr 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Apr 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Streiner|
|11 Jul 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Gerta Rücker|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Jul 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Aug 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Streiner|
|1 Sep 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Gerta Rücker|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|1 Sep 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 Sep 2006||Editorially accepted|
|1 Sep 2006||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-6-42|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.