Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial

  • Rob McCarney1,
  • James Warner1Email author,
  • Steve Iliffe2,
  • Robbert van Haselen3,
  • Mark Griffin2 and
  • Peter Fisher4
BMC Medical Research Methodology20077:30

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-30

Received: 06 March 2007

Accepted: 03 July 2007

Published: 03 July 2007

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Mar 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel O'Connor
5 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Hoerr
10 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - fabrizio benedetti
14 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Aisen
24 Apr 2007 Author responded Author comments - James Warner
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Apr 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Hoerr
8 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - fabrizio benedetti
14 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel O'Connor
15 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Aisen
1 Jul 2007 Author responded Author comments - James Warner
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Jul 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
3 Jul 2007 Editorially accepted
3 Jul 2007 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-7-30

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College London
(2)
Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London
(3)
International Institute for Integrated Medicine
(4)
Royal London Homœopathic Hospital

Advertisement