What do the JAMA editors say when they discuss manuscripts that they are considering for publication? Developing a schema for classifying the content of editorial discussion
© Dickersin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 22 April 2007
Accepted: 25 September 2007
Published: 25 September 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Apr 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 May 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ana Marusic|
|4 Jun 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - M Chew|
|18 Jul 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marcus Muellner|
|31 Jul 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Kay Dickersin|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|31 Jul 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Aug 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - M Chew|
|2 Sep 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marcus Muellner|
|4 Sep 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ana Marusic|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Sep 2007||Editorially accepted|
|25 Sep 2007||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-7-44|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.