Inclusion of zero total event trials in meta-analyses maintains analytic consistency and incorporates all available data
© Friedrich et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 14 November 2006
Accepted: 23 January 2007
Published: 23 January 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Nov 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Nov 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jesse Berlin|
|10 Dec 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Malinee Laopaiboon|
|21 Dec 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Friedrich|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Dec 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jesse Berlin|
|10 Jan 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Friedrich|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Jan 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Jan 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Friedrich|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 Jan 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Jan 2007||Editorially accepted|
|23 Jan 2007||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-7-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.