Demographic and occupational predictors of early response to a mailed invitation to enroll in a longitudinal health study
- Jean-Paul Chretien†1,
- Laura K Chu†2,
- Tyler C Smith†2Email author,
- Besa Smith†2,
- Margaret AK Ryan†2 and
- the Millennium Cohort Study Team
© Chretien et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 24 October 2006
Accepted: 25 January 2007
Published: 25 January 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 Oct 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Nov 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andreas Stuck|
|25 Nov 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tim Allison|
|30 Nov 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lynda Voigt|
|15 Dec 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Laura Chu|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Dec 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lynda Voigt|
|24 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tim Allison|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Jan 2007||Editorially accepted|
|25 Jan 2007||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-7-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.