A cautionary note regarding count models of alcohol consumption in randomized controlled trials
© Horton et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 24 July 2006
Accepted: 15 February 2007
Published: 15 February 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 Jul 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Aug 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Ridout|
|11 Oct 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eric Vittinghoff|
|3 Jan 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Nicholas Horton|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Jan 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eric Vittinghoff|
|8 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Ridout|
|12 Jan 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Nicholas Horton|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Jan 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Feb 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Nicholas Horton|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Feb 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Feb 2007||Editorially accepted|
|15 Feb 2007||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-7-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.