Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies
© Lundh and Gøtzsche; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 05 October 2007
Accepted: 21 April 2008
Published: 21 April 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Oct 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Dec 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - joel gagnier|
|18 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gunn Elisabeth Vist|
|20 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Denise O'Connor|
|21 Feb 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Andreas Lundh|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Feb 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Mar 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - joel gagnier|
|19 Mar 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Denise O'Connor|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Apr 2008||Editorially accepted|
|21 Apr 2008||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-8-22|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.