Improving quality indicator report cards through Bayesian modeling
© Gajewski et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 29 July 2008
Accepted: 18 November 2008
Published: 18 November 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|29 Jul 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Sep 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - souraya sidani|
|26 Sep 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eileen Lake|
|7 Oct 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Byron Gajewski|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Oct 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|31 Oct 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Byron Gajewski|
|Resubmission - Version 8|
|31 Oct 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 8|
|18 Nov 2008||Editorially accepted|
|18 Nov 2008||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-8-77|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.