Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Overstating the evidence – double counting in meta-analysis and related problems

BMC Medical Research Methodology20099:10

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-10

Received: 18 December 2008

Accepted: 13 February 2009

Published: 13 February 2009

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Dec 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lehana Thabane
28 Jan 2009 Author responded Author comments - Stephen Senn
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Jan 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
13 Feb 2009 Editorially accepted
13 Feb 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-9-10

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Statistics, University of Glasgow

Advertisement