Deploying a clinical innovation in the context of actor-patient consultations in general practice: A prelude to a formal clinical trial
- Moyez Jiwa†1Email author,
- Robert K McKinley†2,
- Katrina Spilsbury†3,
- Hayley Arnet†1 and
- Marthe Smith†1
© Jiwa et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 06 January 2009
Accepted: 17 July 2009
Published: 17 July 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|6 Jan 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Jan 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Harris|
|22 Mar 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kieran McGlade|
|24 Apr 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Moyez Jiwa|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Apr 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 May 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Harris|
|5 Jun 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Moyez Jiwa|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|5 Jun 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 Jul 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Moyez Jiwa|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|16 Jul 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|17 Jul 2009||Editorially accepted|
|17 Jul 2009||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-9-54|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.